Tarry for the Nonce

October 10, 2005

She Will Kerry No More

Filed under: News — lmwalker @ 3:31 pm

What happened to Teresa Heinz‘s married name?

Advertisements

10 Comments

  1. Maybe that’s just a pseudonym….

    Comment by Andrew P. — October 10, 2005 @ 4:19 pm

  2. By golly, she had *me* fooled!

    Comment by Anne — October 11, 2005 @ 11:21 am

  3. Doesn’t she have it made or something? The woman, I don’t think, has ever had to work a day in her life.
    And anyway, most working women I know plan on getting married to men who are willing to work, unlike her hubby.

    Comment by Alistair A. — October 11, 2005 @ 11:55 am

  4. You know, arguing over her byline is really just an excuse to dismiss her argument.

    For those of you unfamiliar with the Heinz family, they are one of the most prominent families in Pittsburgh, with a fortune derived from Heinz ketchup and other properties and investments. They run many non-profit organizations which, like the Carnegies (also of Pittsburgh), seek long term solutions for things like world peace, justice, inequality, and all of the issues that are all ultimately bi-partisan in nature.

    BTW, Theresa Heinz-Kerry’s longtime husband, John Heinz, was a REPUBLICAN senator from Pennsylvania.

    Really, her point is

    Comment by Matt — October 11, 2005 @ 6:24 pm

  5. Stupid computer.

    Really, her point is at least worth considering.

    There, now I can post this (but still look like an idiot).

    Comment by Matt — October 11, 2005 @ 6:25 pm

  6. That doesn’t take away from the fact that Heinz-KERRY is insane. You do realize she was the final clincher that lost him the presidency, right? The Dems did everything they could to keep her out of the limelight, but she would continue to muscle her way into the media and so did not paint the prettiest portrait of what *could* have been the First Lady.

    Comment by Anne — October 11, 2005 @ 11:47 pm

  7. Oh? I thought the reason Kerry lost the presidency was because no one cares about the hippy anti-Vietnam stance anymore (at least, no one in *our* generation). That and he seemed a bit shady.

    Comment by Andrew P. — October 12, 2005 @ 10:17 am

  8. “Oh? I thought the reason Kerry lost the presidency was because no one cares about the hippy anti-Vietnam stance anymore (at least, no one in *our* generation). That and he seemed a bit shady.”

    But of course, Andy, my dear, but note I said she was the “final clincher” not the only deciding factor. Lets just say he had an overabundance of strikes against him.

    Comment by Anne — October 12, 2005 @ 12:30 pm

  9. You know, arguing over her byline is really just an excuse to dismiss her argument.

    You jumped to the wrong conclusion, Matt. I wasn’t dismissing her point – mostly because I never actually read the article. I looked at the byline, skimmed the content, realized I didn’t have much of an opinion on the subject and posted it for the amusement of the byline alone.

    Comment by laura — October 12, 2005 @ 1:10 pm

  10. I still say she’s a lazy what-all who don’t really know what she’s talking about. Even if she’s trying to take a stand for women (to which I tip my hat to her) She really can have no say in the matter.

    Comment by Alistair A. — October 15, 2005 @ 10:24 am


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: